10 reasons why The Beatles were better than The Stones

1 Without The Beatles The Stones would still be playing in back street pubs in Kent

The Fabs even gifted The Stones their first hit single

2 The Beatles had an amazingly consistent run of brilliant albums

rubber-soul-front

 

The Stones’ 60s albums were a bit hit and miss. There is a reason why they got a reputation as a singles band

3 Mick’s crimes against fashion

MICK JAGGER

And it got worse

4 The Beatles were the innovators

The Beatles went psychedelic with Revolver. It too nearly two years for The Stones to catch up

5 The Stones in the 80s

Rolling-Stones-Dirty-Work-475805

Jarvis has a point. Some terrible albums

6 The Beatles invented the pop video

Again The Stones copied them, but not for a few years

7 The Beatles just had better songs

There’s a lot of fodder on The Stones’ albums

8 The Beatles released the best album of all time

sgtopepper

And the second best one too

9 There are hundreds of amazing Beatles cover versions

Not so many good Stones ones

10 This

Not convinced? You’d probably prefer this.






About the Author

Ashley

Ashley10 reasons why The Beatles were better than The Stones